SOCIAL MEDIA BRAND ENGAGEMENT AND PERCEIVED RISK IN PURCHASE: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Revista Brasileira de Marketing, ISSN: 2177-5184, Vol: 23, Issue: 4, Page: 1858-1883
2024
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Objective of the study: This research paper aims to develop a conceptual framework based on an extensive literature review in the area of social media communication (SMC) consisting of Firm Generated Content (FGC) and User Generated Content (UGC) to unearth their influences on social media brand engagement (SMBE) and customer-based brand equity (CBBE). The role played by perceived risk is also highlighted. Methodology/approach: This study has critically evaluated the literature to propose the conceptual framework using 101 research articles from 1974 to 2023 that directly or indirectly comprised at least one of the constructs. Main results: This literature review found contradictory results regarding which source is more credible on social media, the firm or the user. This empirical gap is firstly deliberated. Secondly, the disparity on whether engagement drives equity or equity drives engagement on social media led to the conceptual gap. The conceptual model is formulated based on this debate. Theoretical/methodological contributions: While the independent constructs are drawn from the elaboration likelihood model and source credibility theory, the mediating role of SMBE is posited based on the social identity theory. Relevance/originality: In the context of social media, this conceptual model highlights the mediating effect of brand engagement and the moderating effect of perceived risk between social media communication and CBBE. The influence of mediation and moderation could explain the path to CBBE more explicitly.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know