Radiation exposure in endovascular infra-renal aortic aneurysm repair and factors that influence it
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, ISSN: 1678-9741, Vol: 31, Issue: 6, Page: 415-421
2016
- 15Citations
- 1,766Usage
- 32Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- Usage1,766
- Full Text Views1,628
- 1,628
- Abstract Views138
- 138
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
Article Description
Objective: The endovascular repair of aortic abdominal aneurysms exposes the patients and surgical team to ionizing radiation with risk of direct tissue damage and induction of gene mutation. This study aims to describe our standard of radiation exposure in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and the factors that influence it. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients with abdominal infra-renal aortic aneurysms submitted to endovascular repair. This study evaluated the radiation doses [dose area product (DAP)], fluoroscopy durations and their relationships to the patients, aneurysms, and stent-graft characteristics. Results: This study included 127 patients with a mean age of 73 years. The mean DAP was 4.8 mGy.m, and the fluoroscopy time was 21.8 minutes. Aortic bilateral iliac aneurysms, higher body mass index, aneurysms with diameters larger than 60 mm, necks with diameters larger than 28 mm, common iliac arteries with diameters larger than 20 mm, and neck angulations superior to 50 degrees were associated with an increased radiation dose. The number of anatomic risk factors present was associated with increased radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time, regardless of the anatomical risk factors. Conclusion: The radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is significant (mean DAP 4.8 mGy.m) with potential hazards to the surgical team and the patients. The anatomical characteristics of the aneurysm, patient characteristics, and the procedure’s technical difficulty were all related to increased radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair procedures. Approximately 40% of radiation exposure can be explained by body mass index, neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, neck diameter, and aneurysm type.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85009727545&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20160084; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28076617; http://www.gnresearch.org/doi/10.5935/1678-9741.20160084; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000600415&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-76382016000600415&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382016000600415; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-76382016000600415; https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20160084; http://rbccv.org.br/article/2601; http://www.bjcvs.org/pdf/2601/v31n6a02.pdf
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know