Comparison of transcutaneous electrical tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment
Clinics, ISSN: 1807-5932, Vol: 76, Page: e3039
2021
- 10Citations
- 248Usage
- 89Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- Usage248
- Full Text Views165
- 165
- Abstract Views83
- 83
- Captures89
- Readers89
- 89
Article Description
To compare the effectiveness of tibial nerve transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for an overactive bladder, considering the sites of application and frequency of attendance. This multi-arm randomized controlled trial enrolled 137 adult women (61.0±9.0 years) with overactive bladder from a university hospital. They underwent 12 sessions of 30-min TENS application and were assigned to five groups: one leg, once a week (n=26); one leg, twice a week (n=27); two legs, once a week (n=26); two legs, twice a week (n=28); and placebo (n=30). Symptoms of overactive bladder and its impact on quality of life were evaluated before and after 6 or 12 weeks of treatment using the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-V8 and voiding diary. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01912885. The use of one leg, once a week TENS application reduced the frequency of urgency episodes compared with the placebo (1.0±1.6 vs. 1.4±1.9; p =0.046) and frequency of incontinence episodes compared with the placebo (0.7±1.4 vs. 1.4±2.2; p <0.0001). The one-leg, twice a week protocol decreased the urinary frequency compared with the two legs, once a week protocol (8.2±3.5 vs. 9.0±5.1; p =0.026) and placebo (8.2±3.5 vs. 7.9±2.7; p =0.02). Nocturia improved using the two legs, once a week protocol (1.5±1.8) when compared with the one leg, twice a week protocol (1.9±2.0) and placebo (1.7±1.6) ( p =0.005 and p =0.027, respectively). Nocturia also improved using the two legs, twice a week protocol when compared with the one leg, twice a week protocol (1.3±1.2 vs. 1.9±2.0; p =0.011). One-leg stimulation improved the daily urinary frequency, urgency, and incontinence, and the two-leg stimulation once and twice weekly improved nocturia.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593222002149; http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3039; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114285855&origin=inward; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01912885; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406271; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1807593222002149; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322021000100300&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1807-59322021000100300&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322021000100300; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1807-59322021000100300; https://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3039; https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.6061%2Fclinics%2F2021%2Fe3039
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know