Preference of Online Database Access for Medical Students: A Before-and-After Survey of Evidence-Based Medicine Course
Journal of Medical Education, ISSN: 1028-2424, Page: 176-185
2016
- 1,731Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,731
- Abstract Views1,691
- 1,691
- Downloads40
Article Description
Background: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been identified as a core competency that helps physicians improve healthcare quality. Acquiring evidence-based information is a crucial step in EBM implementation. The present study determined the influence of EBM instruction on evidence-based online database access of medical students. Methods: A structured questionnaire survey was administered to third-year undergraduate medical students enrolled in an 18-week elective course in EBM at Taipei Medical University prior to course commencement and after course completion. The means of the pre- and post-course responses were compared using paired-sample t-test. Results: After course completion, the students were more likely to access four evidence-based retrieval databases. Specifically, medical students more often accessed the Cochrane Library (p < 0.001), MD Consult/Clinical Key (p < 0.001), MEDLINE/PubMed (p < 0.001), and UpToDate (p < 0.001). By contrast, the use of Web portals did not increase (p = 0.380). Common motivations for accessing online databases were self-learning and for completing coursework. Conclusions: The EBM course was helpful in increasing the use of online evidence-based databases for medical students. This study has important implications for the delivery of EBM instruction.
Bibliographic Details
台灣醫學教育學會
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know