Symmetry Kernel for Graph Classification
2024
- 118Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage118
- Downloads70
- Abstract Views48
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
This paper presents a novel way to conduct machine learning analysis on graphs and empirically evaluates it. We can not perform such analysis on non-fixed length feature vectors, so first, we must find a way to represent graphs as such. We propose a graph kernel based on graph automorphisms, also known as graph symmetries. We then empirically evaluate the classification accuracy of three machine learning algorithms, SVM, Random Forest, and AdaBoost, using this novel graph kernel against two existing graph kernels and a naive baseline. The models reach a higher classification accuracy on some datasets using our Symmetry kernels than the graphlet kernel and Weisfeiler-Lehman kernel despite our kernel constructing far smaller feature vectors than the existing approaches.
Bibliographic Details
International Conference on Information Systems Development
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know