Relationship Between Optional General and Regional Anesthesia Applied to Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section and Sleep Quality
Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences, ISSN: 2687-2110, Vol: 7, Issue: 2, Page: 300-308
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Objective: This study aimed to explore the association between anesthesia type (spinal or general) administered during cesarean section and subsequent sleep quality in women. Methods: This study conducted from April to August 2023, it involved 150 pregnant participants evenly split between spinal and general anesthesia groups. Patient categorization was based on the type of anesthesia received. Data collection utilized a combination of a Demographic Information and Postpartum Period Survey form, along with the Postpartum Sleep Quality Scale (PSQS). Demographic and clinical details were gathered and compared between the two anesthesia groups. Results: Indicated a higher level of education among the spinal anesthesia group (p < .01). Significant differences were also observed between the groups concerning economic status and number of deliveries (p < .01 and p = .01, respectively). Interestingly, patients who underwent general anesthesia exhibited a notably higher total sleep score, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (p < .01). Weak but statistically significant positive correlations were found between age and number of deliveries, while a weak negative correlation was noted for economic status. Conclusion: Our results indicated that age and general anesthesia were the independent risk factors affecting postpartum sleep quality. Given the increasing trend of women giving birth at alate age, health professionals, particularly midwives, need to be aware of the increased risk of poor sleep quality and should provide suitable advice.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know