UML 2.0 ACTIVITY DIAGRAMS/CSP INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR MODELING AND VERIFICATION OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS
Computer Science, ISSN: 2300-7036, Vol: 22, Issue: 2, Page: 209-235
2021
- 3Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper proposes an approach that integrates UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams (UML2-ADs) and the communicating sequential process (CSP) for modeling and verifying software systems. A UML2-AD is used for modeling a software system, while a CSP is used for verification purposes. The proposed approach consists of another way of transforming UML2-AD models to CSP models. It also focuses on checking the correctness of some properties of the transformation itself. These properties are specified using linear temporal Logic (LTL) and verified using the GROOVE model checker. This approach is based on model- driven engineering (MDE). The meta-modeling is realized using the AToMPM tool, while the model transformation and the correctness of its properties are realized using the GROOVE tool. Finally, we illustrated this approach through a case study.
Bibliographic Details
AGHU University of Science and Technology Press
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know