Neuropilin-1 functions as a VEGFR2 co-receptor to guide developmental angiogenesis independent of ligand binding
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 3, Page: e03720-null
2014
- 116Citations
- 149Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations116
- Citation Indexes116
- 116
- CrossRef103
- Captures149
- Readers149
- 149
Article Description
During development, tissue repair, and tumor growth, most blood vessel networks are generated through angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key regulator of this process and currently both VEGF and its receptors, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and Neuropilin1 (NRP1), are targeted in therapeutic strategies for vascular disease and cancer. NRP1 is essential for vascular morphogenesis, but how NRP1 functions to guide vascular development has not been completely elucidated. In this study, we generated a mouse line harboring a point mutation in the endogenous Nrp1 locus that selectively abolishes VEGF-NRP1 binding (Nrp1(VEGF-)). Nrp1(VEGF-) mutants survive to adulthood with normal vasculature revealing that NRP1 functions independent of VEGF-NRP1 binding during developmental angiogenesis. Moreover, we found that Nrp1-deficient vessels have reduced VEGFR2 surface expression in vivo demonstrating that NRP1 regulates its co-receptor, VEGFR2. Given the resources invested in NRP1-targeted anti-angiogenesis therapies, our results will be integral for developing strategies to re-build vasculature in disease.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.03720; 10.7554/elife.03720.003; 10.7554/elife.03720.018; 10.7554/elife.03720.005; 10.7554/elife.03720.007; 10.7554/elife.03720.001; 10.7554/elife.03720.002; 10.7554/elife.03720.019; 10.7554/elife.03720.012; 10.7554/elife.03720.010; 10.7554/elife.03720.015
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84991501298&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25244320; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/03720/elife-03720-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/03720/elife-03720-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.003; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.018; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.007; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#decision-letter; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03720#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720.015; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03720
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know