Three-color single molecule imaging shows WASP detachment from Arp2/3 complex triggers actin filament branch formation
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 2013, Issue: 2, Page: e01008
2013
- 92Citations
- 180Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations92
- Citation Indexes92
- CrossRef92
- 87
- Captures180
- Readers180
- 180
Article Description
During cell locomotion and endocytosis, membrane-tethered WASP proteins stimulate actin filament nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex. This process generates highly branched arrays of filaments that grow toward the membrane to which they are tethered, a conflict that seemingly would restrict filament growth. Using three-color single-molecule imaging in vitro we revealed how the dynamic associations of Arp2/3 complex with mother filament and WASP are temporally coordinated with initiation of daughter filament growth. We found that WASP proteins dissociated from filamentbound Arp2/3 complex prior to new filament growth. Further, mutations that accelerated release of WASP from filament-bound Arp2/3 complex proportionally accelerated branch formation. These data suggest that while WASP promotes formation of pre-nucleation complexes, filament growth cannot occur until it is triggered by WASP release. This provides a mechanism by which membrane-bound WASP proteins can stimulate network growth without restraining it. © Smith et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.01008; 10.7554/elife.01008.014; 10.7554/elife.01008.011; 10.7554/elife.01008.022; 10.7554/elife.01008.019; 10.7554/elife.01008.004; 10.7554/elife.01008.010; 10.7554/elife.01008.015; 10.7554/elife.01008.002; 10.7554/elife.01008.009; 10.7554/elife.01008.003; 10.7554/elife.01008.001; 10.7554/elife.01008.021; 10.3410/f.718112312.793483856; 10.7554/elife.01008.023
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884697646&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24015360; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#tbl1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.014; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.004; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#media1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.009; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/01008/elife-01008-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/01008/elife-01008-v1.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.021; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/718112312#eval793483856; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.718112312.793483856; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008.023; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01008#author-response; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01008
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know