Hypothalamic melanin concentrating hormone neurons communicate the nutrient value of sugar
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 2013, Issue: 2, Page: e01462
2013
- 113Citations
- 303Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations113
- Citation Indexes113
- 113
- CrossRef102
- Captures303
- Readers303
- 303
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Why you can?t stop ? Eating & Addiction
Everyone knows sugar-rich, fatty foods are unhealthy, but we keep eating them. The diet industry is booming, but so are waistlines. In the UK, 1 out of 5 adults is obese; in the US, the figure is 1 of every 3 adults. Why don?t we eat better? Are we just too weak-willed? Maybe not. The picture emerging from recent research into the neurobiology of eating tells a different story, in which our evolut
Article Description
Sugars that contain glucose, such as sucrose, are generally preferred to artificial sweeteners owing to their post-ingestive rewarding effect, which elevates striatal dopamine (DA) release. While the post-ingestive rewarding effect, which artificial sweeteners do not have, signals the nutrient value of sugar and influences food preference, the neural circuitry that mediates the rewarding effect of glucose is unknown. In this study, we show that optogenetic activation of melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) neurons during intake of the artificial sweetener sucralose increases striatal dopamine levels and inverts the normal preference for sucrose vs sucralose. Conversely, animals with ablation of MCH neurons no longer prefer sucrose to sucralose and show reduced striatal DA release upon sucrose ingestion. We further show that MCH neurons project to reward areas and are required for the post-ingestive rewarding effect of sucrose in sweet-blind Trpm5 mice. These studies identify an essential component of the neural pathways linking nutrient sensing and food reward. © Domingos et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.01462; 10.7554/elife.01462.003; 10.7554/elife.01462.002; 10.7554/elife.01462.011; 10.7554/elife.01462.014; 10.7554/elife.01462.008; 10.7554/elife.01462.005; 10.7554/elife.01462.018; 10.7554/elife.01462.001; 10.7554/elife.01462.019
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84891822239&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24381247; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.014; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.018; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/01462/elife-01462-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/01462/elife-01462-v1.xml; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01462#author-response; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01462
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know