The Brm-HDAC3-Erm repressor complex suppresses dedifferentiation in Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 2014, Issue: 3, Page: e01906
2014
- 52Citations
- 81Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations52
- Citation Indexes52
- CrossRef52
- 46
- Captures81
- Readers81
- 81
Article Description
The control of self-renewal and differentiation of neural stem and progenitor cells is a crucial issue in stem cell and cancer biology. Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages are prone to developing impaired neuroblast homeostasis if the limited self-renewing potential of intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) is unrestrained. Here, we demonstrate that Drosophila SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling Brahma (Brm) complex functions cooperatively with another chromatin remodeling factor, Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) to suppress the formation of ectopic type II neuroblasts. We show that multiple components of the Brm complex and HDAC3 physically associate with Earmuff (Erm), a type II-specific transcription factor that prevents dedifferentiation of INPs into neuroblasts. Consistently, the predicted Erm-binding motif is present in most of known binding loci of Brm. Furthermore, brm and hdac3 genetically interact with erm to prevent type II neuroblast overgrowth. Thus, the Brm-HDAC3-Erm repressor complex suppresses dedifferentiation of INPs back into type II neuroblasts. © Koe et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.01906; 10.7554/elife.01906.005; 10.7554/elife.01906.010; 10.7554/elife.01906.014; 10.7554/elife.01906.003; 10.7554/elife.01906.008; 10.7554/elife.01906.001; 10.7554/elife.01906.007; 10.7554/elife.01906.012; 10.7554/elife.01906.002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84898739962&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618901; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#tbl2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.014; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#tbl1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.007; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/01906/elife-01906-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/01906/elife-01906-v1.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/01906#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906.002; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.01906
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know