Temporal dynamics and developmental memory of 3D chromatin architecture at Hox gene loci
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 2014, Issue: 3, Page: e02557
2014
- 117Citations
- 214Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations117
- Citation Indexes117
- CrossRef117
- 109
- Captures214
- Readers214
- 214
Article Description
Hox genes are essential regulators of embryonic development. Their step-wise transcriptional activation follows their genomic topology and the various states of activation are subsequently memorized into domains of progressively overlapping gene products. We have analyzed the 3D chromatin organization of Hox clusters during their early activation in vivo, using high-resolution circular chromosome conformation capture. Initially, Hox clusters are organized as single chromatin compartments containing all genes and bivalent chromatin marks. Transcriptional activation is associated with a dynamic bi-modal 3D organization, whereby the genes switch autonomously from an inactive to an active compartment. These local 3D dynamics occur within a framework of constitutive interactions within the surrounding Topological Associated Domains, indicating that this regulation process is mostly cluster intrinsic. The step-wise progression in time is fixed at various body levels and thus can account for the chromatin architectures previously described at a later stage for different anterior to posterior levels.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.02557; 10.7554/elife.02557.022; 10.7554/elife.02557.011; 10.7554/elife.02557.002; 10.7554/elife.02557.015; 10.7554/elife.02557.012; 10.7554/elife.02557.003; 10.7554/elife.02557.016; 10.7554/elife.02557.017; 10.7554/elife.02557.023; 10.7554/elife.02557.001; 10.7554/elife.02557.021; 10.7554/elife.02557.024; 10.7554/elife.02557.020
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899894562&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24843030; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#tbl3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#tbl1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.017; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.023; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#tbl2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.021; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/02557/elife-02557-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/02557/elife-02557-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.024; https://elifesciences.org/articles/02557#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557.020; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.02557; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/24843030; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4017647
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know