Divergent kleisin subunits of cohesin specify mechanisms to tether and release meiotic chromosomes
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 3, Issue: August2014, Page: 1-27
2014
- 69Citations
- 89Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations69
- Citation Indexes69
- CrossRef69
- 57
- Captures89
- Readers89
- 89
Article Description
We show that multiple, functionally specialized cohesin complexes mediate the establishment and two-step release of sister chromatid cohesion that underlies the production of haploid gametes. In C. elegans, the kleisin subunits REC-8 and COH-3/4 differ between meiotic cohesins and endow them with distinctive properties that specify how cohesins load onto chromosomes and then trigger and release cohesion. Unlike REC-8 cohesin, COH-3/4 cohesin becomes cohesive through a replication-independent mechanism initiated by the DNA doublestranded breaks that induce crossover recombination. Thus, break-induced cohesion also tethers replicated meiotic chromosomes. Later, recombination stimulates separase-independent removal of REC-8 and COH-3/4 cohesins from reciprocal chromosomal territories flanking the crossover site. This region-specific removal likely underlies the two-step separation of homologs and sisters. Unexpectedly, COH-3/4 performs cohesion-independent functions in synaptonemal complex assembly. This new model for cohesin function diverges from that established in yeast but likely applies directly to plants and mammals, which utilize similar meiotic kleisins.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.03467; 10.7554/elife.03467.018; 10.7554/elife.03467.005; 10.7554/elife.03467.001; 10.7554/elife.03467.002; 10.7554/elife.03467.017; 10.7554/elife.03467.003; 10.7554/elife.03467.013; 10.7554/elife.03467.006; 10.7554/elife.03467.010
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926496956&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25171895; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.018; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/03467/elife-03467-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/03467/elife-03467-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.017; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/03467#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467.010; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.03467
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know