Kinetochore-independent chromosome segregation driven by lateral microtubule bundles
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 4, Issue: MAY, Page: 1-53
2015
- 65Citations
- 75Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations65
- Citation Indexes65
- CrossRef65
- 58
- Captures75
- Readers75
- 75
Article Description
During cell division, chromosomes attach to spindle microtubules at sites called kinetochores, and force generated at the kinetochore-microtubule interface is the main driver of chromosome movement. Surprisingly, kinetochores are not required for chromosome segregation on acentrosomal spindles in C. elegans oocytes, but the mechanism driving chromosomes apart in their absence is not understood. Here we show that lateral microtubule-chromosome associations established during prometaphase remain intact during anaphase to facilitate separation, defining a novel form of kinetochore-independent segregation. Chromosome dynamics during congression and segregation are controlled by opposing forces; plus-end directed forces are mediated by a protein complex that forms a ring around the chromosome center and dynein on chromosome arms provides a minus-end force. At anaphase onset, ring removal shifts the balance between these forces, triggering poleward movement along lateral microtubule bundles. This represents an elegant strategy for controlling chromosomal movements during cell division distinct from the canonical kinetochore-driven mechanism.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.06462; 10.7554/elife.06462.010; 10.7554/elife.06462.008; 10.7554/elife.06462.018; 10.7554/elife.06462.003; 10.7554/elife.06462.016; 10.7554/elife.06462.001; 10.7554/elife.06462.022; 10.7554/elife.06462.002; 10.7554/elife.06462.013; 10.7554/elife.06462.014; 10.7554/elife.06462.007; 10.7554/elife.06462.015; 10.7554/elife.06462.009; 10.7554/elife.06462.005; 10.7554/elife.06462.019; 10.7554/elife.06462.021; 10.7554/elife.06462.011; 10.7554/elife.06462.004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84930652325&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026148; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.018; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462; http://elifesciences.org/lookup/doi/10.7554/eLife.06462; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/06462/elife-06462-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/06462/elife-06462-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.001; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.014; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.007; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.009; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.021; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.004; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#author-response; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know