PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Kinetochore-independent chromosome segregation driven by lateral microtubule bundles

eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 4, Issue: MAY, Page: 1-53
2015
  • 65
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 75
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 71
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    65
  • Captures
    75
  • Social Media
    71
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      71
      • Facebook
        71

Article Description

During cell division, chromosomes attach to spindle microtubules at sites called kinetochores, and force generated at the kinetochore-microtubule interface is the main driver of chromosome movement. Surprisingly, kinetochores are not required for chromosome segregation on acentrosomal spindles in C. elegans oocytes, but the mechanism driving chromosomes apart in their absence is not understood. Here we show that lateral microtubule-chromosome associations established during prometaphase remain intact during anaphase to facilitate separation, defining a novel form of kinetochore-independent segregation. Chromosome dynamics during congression and segregation are controlled by opposing forces; plus-end directed forces are mediated by a protein complex that forms a ring around the chromosome center and dynein on chromosome arms provides a minus-end force. At anaphase onset, ring removal shifts the balance between these forces, triggering poleward movement along lateral microtubule bundles. This represents an elegant strategy for controlling chromosomal movements during cell division distinct from the canonical kinetochore-driven mechanism.

Bibliographic Details

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84930652325&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026148; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.018; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462; http://elifesciences.org/lookup/doi/10.7554/eLife.06462; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/06462/elife-06462-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/06462/elife-06462-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.001; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.014; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.007; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.009; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.021; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#media1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462.004; https://elifesciences.org/articles/06462#author-response; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.06462

Christina C. Muscat; Keila M. Torre-Santiago; Michael V. Tran; Sarah M. Wignall; James A. Powers

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

Neuroscience; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Immunology and Microbiology

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know