Arcuate hypothalamic AgRP and putative pomc neurons show opposite changes in spiking across multiple timescales
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 4, Issue: JULY 2015, Page: 1-25
2015
- 195Citations
- 219Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations195
- Citation Indexes195
- 195
- CrossRef181
- Captures219
- Readers219
- 219
- Mentions4
- News Mentions4
- 4
Most Recent News
Stochastic neuropeptide signals compete to calibrate the rate of satiation
Nature, Published online: 06 November 2024; doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08164-8 Release of hunger-promoting and satiety-promoting neuropeptides drives opposing changes in the second messenger cAMP in awake mouse paraventricular hypothalamic MC4R neurons, thereby regulating synaptic plasticity and the transition to satiety with each bite of food.
Article Description
Agouti-related-peptide (AgRP) neurons—interoceptive neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARC)—are both necessary and sufficient for driving feeding behavior. To better understand the functional roles of AgRP neurons, we performed optetrode electrophysiological recordings from AgRP neurons in awake, behaving AgRP-IRES-Cre mice. In free-feeding mice, we observed a fivefold increase in AgRP neuron firing with mounting caloric deficit in afternoon vs morning recordings. In food-restricted mice, as food became available, AgRP neuron firing dropped, yet remained elevated as compared to firing in sated mice. The rapid drop in spiking activity of AgRP neurons at meal onset may reflect a termination of the drive to find food, while residual, persistent spiking may reflect a sustained drive to consume food. Moreover, nearby neurons inhibited by AgRP neuron photostimulation, likely including satiety-promoting pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons, demonstrated opposite changes in spiking. Finally, firing of ARC neurons was also rapidly modulated within seconds of individual licks for liquid food. These findings suggest novel roles for antagonistic AgRP and POMC neurons in the regulation of feeding behaviors across multiple timescales.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.07122; 10.7554/elife.07122.016; 10.7554/elife.07122.015; 10.7554/elife.07122.010; 10.7554/elife.07122.002; 10.7554/elife.07122.007; 10.7554/elife.07122.005; 10.7554/elife.07122.011; 10.7554/elife.07122.001; 10.7554/elife.07122.003; 10.7554/elife.07122.012
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84937437240&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26159614; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.007; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122; http://elifesciences.org/lookup/doi/10.7554/eLife.07122; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/07122/elife-07122-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/07122/elife-07122-v1.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/07122#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122.012; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.07122
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know