Stable G protein-effector complexes in striatal neurons: Mechanism of assembly and role in neurotransmitter signaling
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 4, Issue: NOVEMBER2015, Page: 1-21
2015
- 27Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations27
- Citation Indexes27
- 27
- CrossRef19
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
Article Description
In the striatum, signaling via G protein-coupled neurotransmitter receptors is essential for motor control. Critical to this process is the effector enzyme adenylyl cyclase type 5 (AC5) that produces second messenger cAMP upon receptor-mediated activation by G protein G. However, the molecular organization of the G-AC5 signaling axis is not well understood. In this study, we report that in the striatum AC5 exists in a stable pre-coupled complex with subunits of G heterotrimer. We use genetic mouse models with disruption in individual components of the complex to reveal hierarchical order of interactions required for AC5-G stability. We further identify that the assembly of AC5-G complex is mediated by PhLP1 chaperone that plays central role in neurotransmitter receptor coupling to cAMP production motor learning. These findings provide evidence for the existence of stable G protein-effector signaling complexes and identify a new component essential for their assembly.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.10451; 10.7554/elife.10451.007; 10.7554/elife.10451.011; 10.7554/elife.10451.008; 10.7554/elife.10451.009; 10.7554/elife.10451.006; 10.7554/elife.10451.005; 10.7554/elife.10451.001; 10.7554/elife.10451.010; 10.7554/elife.10451.004; 10.7554/elife.10451.002; 10.7554/elife.10451.003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84955260931&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26613416; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.007; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.009; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.010; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/10451/elife-10451-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/10451/elife-10451-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.004; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#decision-letter; https://elifesciences.org/articles/10451#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451.003; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.10451
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know