Structural mechanism of ligand activation in human calcium-sensing receptor
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 5, Issue: JULY, Page: e13662
2016
- 196Citations
- 164Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations196
- Citation Indexes196
- 196
- CrossRef172
- Captures164
- Readers164
- 164
- Mentions2
- News Mentions1
- News1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
Human calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that maintains extracellular Ca homeostasis through the regulation of parathyroid hormone secretion. It functions as a disulfide-tethered homodimer composed of three main domains, the Venus Flytrap module, cysteine-rich domain, and seven-helix transmembrane region. Here, we present the crystal structures of the entire extracellular domain of CaSR in the resting and active conformations. We provide direct evidence that L-amino acids are agonists of the receptor. In the active structure, L-Trp occupies the orthosteric agonist-binding site at the interdomain cleft and is primarily responsible for inducing extracellular domain closure to initiate receptor activation. Our structures reveal multiple binding sites for Ca and PO ions. Both ions are crucial for structural integrity of the receptor. While Ca ions stabilize the active state, PO ions reinforce the inactive conformation. The activation mechanism of CaSR involves the formation of a novel dimer interface between subunits.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.13662; 10.7554/elife.13662.016; 10.7554/elife.13662.018; 10.7554/elife.13662.021; 10.7554/elife.13662.003; 10.7554/elife.13662.031; 10.7554/elife.13662.024; 10.7554/elife.13662.002; 10.7554/elife.13662.010; 10.7554/elife.13662.023; 10.7554/elife.13662.009; 10.7554/elife.13662.013; 10.7554/elife.13662.032; 10.7554/elife.13662.022; 10.7554/elife.13662.019; 10.7554/elife.13662.006; 10.7554/elife.13662.026; 10.7554/elife.13662.025; 10.7554/elife.13662.001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84983057081&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27434672; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.018; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.021; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/13662/elife-13662-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/13662/elife-13662-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#tbl1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.003; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.031; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig11; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.024; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig10; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.023; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.009; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.032; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig9; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#decision-letter; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig13; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.026; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#fig12; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.025; https://elifesciences.org/articles/13662#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662.001; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.13662
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know