Insulin signaling controls neurotransmission via the 4eBP-dependent modification of the exocytotic machinery
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 5, Issue: AUGUST, Page: e16807
2016
- 20Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef18
- Captures64
- Readers64
- 64
Article Description
Altered insulin signaling has been linked to widespread nervous system dysfunction including cognitive dysfunction, neuropathy and susceptibility to neurodegenerative disease. However, knowledge of the cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of insulin on neuronal function is incomplete. Here, we show that cell autonomous insulin signaling within the Drosophila CM9 motor neuron regulates the release of neurotransmitter via alteration of the synaptic vesicle fusion machinery. This effect of insulin utilizes the FOXO-dependent regulation of the thor gene, which encodes the Drosophila homologue of the eif-4e binding protein (4eBP). A critical target of this regulatory mechanism is Complexin, a synaptic protein known to regulate synaptic vesicle exocytosis. We find that the amounts of Complexin protein observed at the synapse is regulated by insulin and genetic manipulations of Complexin levels support the model that increased synaptic Complexin reduces neurotransmission in response to insulin signaling.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.16807; 10.7554/elife.16807.012; 10.7554/elife.16807.002; 10.7554/elife.16807.001; 10.7554/elife.16807.015; 10.7554/elife.16807.010; 10.7554/elife.16807.011; 10.7554/elife.16807.006; 10.7554/elife.16807.003; 10.7554/elife.16807.016; 10.7554/elife.16807.009; 10.7554/elife.16807.005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84986181782&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525480; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.001; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#decision-letter; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.003; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.016; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/16807/elife-16807-v3.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/16807/elife-16807-v3.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.009; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#tbl1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/16807#author-response; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.16807
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know