Mechanism of cargo-directed Atg8 conjugation during selective autophagy
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 5, Issue: NOVEMBER2016, Page: e18544
2016
- 53Citations
- 111Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations53
- Citation Indexes53
- CrossRef53
- 52
- Captures111
- Readers111
- 111
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
The Atg8 Family of Proteins—Modulating Shape and Functionality of Autophagic Membranes
The latter are centered on the Atg8 family of proteins which are reversibly linked to membrane lipids. Proteins of the Atg8 family were among the first components of the core autophagy machinery to be characterized in molecular detail. While the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae expresses a single Atg8, the family has expanded significantly during evolution; in humans it comprises seven active genes
Most Recent News
Mechanism of cargo-directed Atg8 conjugation during selective autophagy
Research Article ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Dorotea Fracchiolla Justyna Sawa-Makarska Bettina Zens Anita de Ruiter Gabriele Zaffagnini Andrea Brezovich Julia Romanov Kathrin Runggatscher Claudine Kraft Bojan Zagrovic
Article Description
Selective autophagy is mediated by cargo receptors that link the cargo to the isolation membrane via interactions with Atg8 proteins. Atg8 proteins are localized to the membrane in an ubiquitin-like conjugation reaction, but how this conjugation is coupled to the presence of the cargo is unclear. Here we show that the S. cerevisiae Atg19, Atg34 and the human p62, Optineurin and NDP52 cargo receptors interact with the E3-like enzyme Atg12 Atg5-Atg16, which stimulates Atg8 conjugation. The interaction of Atg19 with the Atg12 Atg5-Atg16 complex is mediated by its Atg8-interacting motifs (AIMs). We identify the AIM-binding sites in the Atg5 subunit and mutation of these sites impairs selective autophagy. In a reconstituted system the recruitment of the E3 to the prApe1 cargo is sufficient to drive accumulation of conjugated Atg8 at the cargo. The interaction of the Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 complex and Atg8 with Atg19 is mutually exclusive, which may confer directionality to the system.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.18544; 10.7554/elife.18544.001; 10.7554/elife.18544.011; 10.7554/elife.18544.022; 10.7554/elife.18544.013; 10.7554/elife.18544.002; 10.7554/elife.18544.005; 10.7554/elife.18544.023; 10.7554/elife.18544.018; 10.7554/elife.18544.025; 10.7554/elife.18544.026; 10.7554/elife.18544.024; 10.7554/elife.18544.008; 10.7554/elife.18544.003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006010858&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27879200; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/18544/elife-18544-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/18544/elife-18544-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#tbl1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.023; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.018; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.025; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.026; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#tbl2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.024; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#author-response; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/18544#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544.003; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.18544
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know