Aberrant corticosteroid metabolism in tumor cells enables GR takeover in enzalutamide resistant prostate cancer
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6
2017
- 83Citations
- 80Captures
- 5Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations83
- Citation Indexes83
- 83
- CrossRef72
- Captures80
- Readers80
- 80
- Mentions5
- News Mentions5
- 5
Most Recent News
Sex differences orchestrated by androgens at single-cell resolution
Nature, Published online: 10 April 2024; doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07291-6 The effects of sex and androgens on the molecular programs and cellular populations are explored using a single-cell transcriptomic atlas comprising over 2.3 million cells from different tissues in Mus musculus.
Article Description
Prostate cancer is driven by androgen stimulation of the androgen receptor (AR). The next-generation AR antagonist, enzalutamide, prolongs survival, but resistance and lethal disease eventually prevail. Emerging data suggest that the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is upregulated in this context, stimulating expression of AR-target genes that permit continued growth despite AR blockade. However, countering this mechanism by administration of GR antagonists is problematic because GR is essential for life. We show that enzalutamide treatment in human models of prostate cancer and patient tissues is accompanied by a ubiquitin E3-ligase, AMFR, mediating loss of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-2 (11β-HSD2), which otherwise inactivates cortisol, sustaining tumor cortisol concentrations to stimulate GR and enzalutamide resistance. Remarkably, reinstatement of 11β-HSD2 expression, or AMFR loss, reverses enzalutamide resistance in mouse xenograft tumors. Together, these findings reveal a surprising metabolic mechanism of enzalutamide resistance that may be targeted with a strategy that circumvents a requirement for systemic GR ablation.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.20183; 10.7554/elife.20183.008; 10.7554/elife.20183.012; 10.7554/elife.20183.013; 10.7554/elife.20183.004; 10.7554/elife.20183.001; 10.7554/elife.20183.006; 10.7554/elife.20183.010; 10.7554/elife.20183.002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85013498415&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191869; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/20183/elife-20183-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/20183/elife-20183-v1.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.004; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/20183#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183.002; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.20183
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know