Control of PNG kinase, a key regulator of mrna translation, is coupled to meiosis completion at egg activation
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6
2017
- 20Citations
- 39Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef17
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent Blog
Interruptor elegante controla a tradução na transição de ovo para o embrião: mero acaso, fortuita necessidade ou design inteligente?
Control of PNG kinase, a key regulator of mRNA translation, is coupled to meiosis completion at egg activation Masatoshi Hara Boryana Petrova Terry L Orr-Weaver Is a corresponding author Whitehead Institute and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States RESEARCH ARTICLE May 30, 2017 Abstract The oocyte-to-embryo transition involves ext
Most Recent News
Elegant Switch Controls Translation in Transition From Egg to Embryo
The transition from an egg to a developing embryo is one of life’s most remarkable transformations. Whitehead Institute researchers have deciphered how one aspect—control of
Article Description
The oocyte-to-embryo transition involves extensive changes in mRNA translation, regulated in Drosophila by the PNG kinase complex whose activity we show here to be under precise developmental control. Despite presence of the catalytic PNG subunit and the PLU and GNU activating subunits in the mature oocyte, GNU is phosphorylated at Cyclin B/CDK1sites and unable to bind PNG and PLU. In vitro phosphorylation of GNU by CyclinB/CDK1 blocks activation of PNG. Meiotic completion promotes GNU dephosphorylation and PNG kinase activation to regulate translation. The critical regulatory effect of phosphorylation is shown by replacement in the oocyte with a phosphorylation-resistant form of GNU, which promotes PNG-GNU complex formation, elevation of Cyclin B, and meiotic defects consistent with premature PNG activation. After PNG activation GNU is destabilized, thus inactivating PNG. This short-lived burst in kinase activity links development with maternal mRNA translation and ensures irreversibility of the oocyteto- embryo transition.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.22219; 10.7554/elife.22219.020; 10.7554/elife.22219.014; 10.7554/elife.22219.003; 10.7554/elife.22219.002; 10.7554/elife.22219.022; 10.7554/elife.22219.008; 10.7554/elife.22219.001; 10.7554/elife.22219.017; 10.7554/elife.22219.019; 10.7554/elife.22219.021; 10.7554/elife.22219.023
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85020456394&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28555567; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.020; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.014; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.017; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.021; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219.023; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/22219/elife-22219-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/22219/elife-22219-v1.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22219#author-response; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22219
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know