Structural reorganization of the chromatin remodeling enzyme Chd1 upon engagement with nucleosomes
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6
2017
- 49Citations
- 84Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations49
- Citation Indexes49
- CrossRef49
- 41
- Captures84
- Readers84
- 84
Article Description
The yeast Chd1 protein acts to position nucleosomes across genomes. Here, we model the structure of the Chd1 protein in solution and when bound to nucleosomes. In the apo state, the DNA-binding domain contacts the edge of the nucleosome while in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, ADP-beryllium fluoride, we observe additional interactions between the ATPase domain and the adjacent DNA gyre 1.5 helical turns from the dyad axis of symmetry. Binding in this conformation involves unravelling the outer turn of nucleosomal DNA and requires substantial reorientation of the DNA-binding domain with respect to the ATPase domains. The orientation of the DNA-binding domain is mediated by sequences in the N-terminus and mutations to this part of the protein have positive and negative effects on Chd1 activity. These observations indicate that the unfavorable alignment of C-terminal DNA-binding region in solution contributes to an auto-inhibited state.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.22510; 10.7554/elife.22510.013; 10.7554/elife.22510.049; 10.7554/elife.22510.016; 10.7554/elife.22510.026; 10.7554/elife.22510.021; 10.7554/elife.22510.015; 10.7554/elife.22510.001; 10.7554/elife.22510.020; 10.7554/elife.22510.002; 10.7554/elife.22510.005; 10.7554/elife.22510.048
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85017511461&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28332978; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.013; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.049; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.026; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.021; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.020; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/22510/elife-22510-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/22510/elife-22510-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510.048; https://elifesciences.org/articles/22510#decision-letter; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.22510
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know