Meru couples planar cell polarity with apical-basal polarity during asymmetric cell division
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6, Page: e25014
2017
- 14Citations
- 62Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- CrossRef14
- 13
- Captures62
- Readers62
- 62
Article Description
Polarity is a shared feature of most cells. In epithelia, apical-basal polarity often coexists, and sometimes intersects with planar cell polarity (PCP), which orients cells in the epithelial plane. From a limited set of core building blocks (e.g. the Par complexes for apical-basal polarity and the Frizzled/Dishevelled complex for PCP), a diverse array of polarized cells and tissues are generated. This suggests the existence of little-studied tissue-specific factors that rewire the core polarity modules to the appropriate conformation. In Drosophila sensory organ precursors (SOPs), the core PCP components initiate the planar polarization of apical-basal determinants, ensuring asymmetric division into daughter cells of different fates. We show that Meru, a RASSF9/RASSF10 homologue, is expressed specifically in SOPs, recruited to the posterior cortex by Frizzled/Dishevelled, and in turn polarizes the apical-basal polarity factor Bazooka (Par3). Thus, Meru belongs to a class of proteins that act cell/tissue-specifically to remodel the core polarity machinery.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.25014; 10.7554/elife.25014.017; 10.7554/elife.25014.013; 10.7554/elife.25014.001; 10.7554/elife.25014.007; 10.7554/elife.25014.011; 10.7554/elife.25014.005; 10.7554/elife.25014.002; 10.7554/elife.25014.022; 10.7554/elife.25014.023; 10.3929/ethz-b-000191249
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85022319467&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28665270; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.017; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.007; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.005; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014.023; https://elifesciences.org/articles/25014#author-response; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/25014/elife-25014-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/25014/elife-25014-v1.xml; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/191249; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.25014; http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000191249; https://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000191249; https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/191249; https://f1000.com/prime/727762289#eval793536968; https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/20.500.11850/191249/2/elife-25014-v1.pdf
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know