Blockade of the LRP16-PKR-NF-κb signaling axis sensitizes colorectal carcinoma cells to DNA-damaging cytotoxic therapy
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6
2017
- 22Citations
- 36Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef18
- Patent Family Citations1
- Patent Families1
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Blockade of the LRP16-PKR-NF-κB signaling axis sensitizes colorectal carcinoma cells to DNA-damaging cytotoxic therapy
Thank you for submitting your article "Blockade of the LRP16-PKR-NF-κB signaling axis sensitizes tumor cells to DNA-damaging cytotoxic therapy" for consideration by eLife . Your
Article Description
Acquired therapeutic resistance by tumors is a substantial impediment to reducing the morbidity and mortality that are attributable to human malignancies. The mechanisms responsible for the dramatic shift between chemosensitivity and chemoresistance in colorectal carcinoma have not been defined. Here, we report that LRP16 selectively interacts and activates double-stranded RNA-dependent kinase (PKR), and also acts as scaffolds to assist the formation of a ternary complex of PKR and IKKβ, prolonging the polymers of ADP-ribose (PAR)-dependent nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) transactivation caused by DNA-damaging agents and confers acquired chemoresistance. We also identified a small molecule, MRS2578, which strikingly abrogated the binding of LRP16 to PKR and IKKβ, converting LRP16 into a death molecule and forestalling colon tumorigenesis. Inclusion of MRS2578 wiThetoposide, versus each drug alone, exhibited synergistic antitumor cytotoxicity in xenografts. Our combinatorial approach introduces a strategy to enhance the efficacy of genotoxicity therapies for the treatment of tumors.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.27301; 10.7554/elife.27301.021; 10.7554/elife.27301.010; 10.7554/elife.27301.001; 10.7554/elife.27301.031; 10.7554/elife.27301.002; 10.7554/elife.27301.030; 10.7554/elife.27301.017; 10.7554/elife.27301.019; 10.7554/elife.27301.006; 10.7554/elife.27301.025; 10.7554/elife.27301.015; 10.7554/elife.27301.003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029225958&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28820388; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.021; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.031; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.030; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.017; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.025; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/27301/elife-27301-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/27301/elife-27301-v1.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/27301#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301.003; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.27301
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know