Atg9 antagonizes TOR signaling to regulate intestinal cell growth and epithelial homeostasis in Drosophila
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6
2017
- 40Citations
- 86Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations40
- Citation Indexes40
- 40
- CrossRef38
- Captures86
- Readers86
- 86
Article Description
Autophagy is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and survival under various stress conditions. Autophagy-related gene 9 (Atg9) encodes a multipass transmembrane protein thought to act as a membrane carrier for forming autophagosomes. However, the molecular regulation and physiological importance of Atg9 in animal development remain largely unclear. Here, we generated Atg9 null mutant flies and found that loss of Atg9 led to shortened lifespan, locomotor defects, and increased susceptibility to stress. Atg9 loss also resulted in aberrant adult midgut morphology with dramatically enlarged enterocytes. Interestingly, inhibiting the TOR signaling pathway rescued the midgut defects of the Atg9 mutants. In addition, Atg9 interacted with PALS1-associated tight junction protein (Patj), which associates with TSC2 to regulate TOR activity. Depletion of Atg9 caused a marked decrease in TSC2 levels. Our findings revealed an antagonistic relationship between Atg9 and TOR signaling in the regulation of cell growth and tissue homeostasis.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.29338; 10.7554/elife.29338.039; 10.7554/elife.29338.008; 10.7554/elife.29338.032; 10.7554/elife.29338.006; 10.7554/elife.29338.028; 10.7554/elife.29338.002; 10.7554/elife.29338.001; 10.7554/elife.29338.016; 10.7554/elife.29338.022; 10.7554/elife.29338.012; 10.7554/elife.29338.037; 10.7554/elife.29338.038
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85036530889&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144896; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.039; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.032; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.028; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.037; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338#respfig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338.038; https://elifesciences.org/articles/29338; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/29338/elife-29338-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/29338/elife-29338-v2.xml; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.29338
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know