An orphan cbb-type cytochrome oxidase subunit supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth and virulence
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6
2017
- 69Citations
- 113Captures
- 7Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations69
- Citation Indexes69
- 69
- CrossRef67
- Captures113
- Readers113
- 113
- Mentions7
- News Mentions6
- News6
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Researchers Identify How Bacterium Survives in Oxygen-poor Environments
NewsBiologists have revealed a mechanism by which bacterial cells in crowded, oxygen-deprived environments access oxygen for energy production, ensuring survival of the cell. The finding could explain how some bacteria are able to thrive in oxygen-poor environments.Contributed Author: Columbia UniversityTopics: Biology
Most Recent News
Researchers Identify How Bacterium Survives in Oxygen-poor Environments
biologists have revealed a mechanism by which bacterial cells in crowded, oxygen-deprived environments access oxygen for energy production, ensuring survival of the cell. The finding
Article Description
Hypoxia is a common challenge faced by bacteria during associations with hosts due in part to the formation of densely packed communities (biofilms). cbb-type cytochrome c oxidases, which catalyze the terminal step in respiration and have a high affinity for oxygen, have been linked to bacterial pathogenesis. The pseudomonads are unusual in that they often contain multiple full and partial (i.e. ‘orphan’) operons for cbb3-type oxidases and oxidase subunits. Here, we describe a unique role for the orphan catalytic subunit CcoN4 in colony biofilm development and respiration in the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. We also show that CcoN4 contributes to the reduction of phenazines, antibiotics that support redox balancing for cells in biofilms, and to virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of infection. These results highlight the relevance of the colony biofilm model to pathogenicity and underscore the potential of cbb-type oxidases as therapeutic targets.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.30205; 10.7554/elife.30205.021; 10.7554/elife.30205.003; 10.7554/elife.30205.019; 10.7554/elife.30205.018; 10.7554/elife.30205.013; 10.7554/elife.30205.022; 10.7554/elife.30205.001; 10.7554/elife.30205.004; 10.7554/elife.30205.011; 10.7554/elife.30205.016; 10.7554/elife.30205.017; 10.7554/elife.30205.009; 10.7554/elife.30205.015; 10.7554/elife.30205.002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85036529038&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29160206; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.021; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#table4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.019; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#table3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.018; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.013; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#author-response; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.022; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.004; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#table1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#table2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.017; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.009; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.015; https://elifesciences.org/articles/30205#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205.002; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/30205/elife-30205-v1.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/30205/elife-30205-v1.xml; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.30205
eLife Sciences Organisation, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know