Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for piezo mechanosensitivity
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 6
2017
- 284Citations
- 360Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations284
- Citation Indexes284
- 284
- CrossRef264
- Captures360
- Readers360
- 358
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Hacia la explicación a escala molecular del sentido del tacto
Un ingeniero diseñaría un sensor mecánico mediante un material piezoeléctrico. En su lugar las células usan canales iónicos mecanosensibles, como Piezo1 y Piezo2, que se abren bajo presión (o tensión) en la membrana de fosfolípidos, permitiendo el paso de iones que producen un impulso nervioso. Se publican en Nature y en eLife sendas estructuras tridimensionales de los canales Piezo1 (humano) y mP
Article Description
Mechanosensitive ion channels convert external mechanical stimuli into electrochemical signals for critical processes including touch sensation, balance, and cardiovascular regulation. The best understood mechanosensitive channel, MscL, opens a wide pore, which accounts for mechanosensitive gating due to in-plane area expansion. Eukaryotic Piezo channels have a narrow pore and therefore must capture mechanical forces to control gating in another way. We present a cryo-EM structure of mouse Piezo1 in a closed conformation at 3.7Å -resolution. The channel is a triskelion with arms consisting of repeated arrays of 4-TM structural units surrounding a pore. Its shape deforms the membrane locally into a dome. We present a hypothesis in which the membrane deformation changes upon channel opening. Quantitatively, membrane tension will alter gating energetics in proportion to the change in projected area under the dome. This mechanism can account for highly sensitive mechanical gating in the setting of a narrow, cation-selective pore.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.33660; 10.7554/elife.33660.016; 10.7554/elife.33660.012; 10.7554/elife.33660.007; 10.7554/elife.33660.027; 10.7554/elife.33660.008; 10.7554/elife.33660.003; 10.7554/elife.33660.001; 10.7554/elife.33660.002; 10.7554/elife.33660.014; 10.7554/elife.33660.018; 10.3410/f.732284646.793563946; 10.7554/elife.33660.028
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041357152&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29231809; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.016; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#table1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.007; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#decision-letter; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.027; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.008; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.014; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/33660/elife-33660-v2.pdf; https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/33660/elife-33660-v2.xml; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#fig7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.018; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/732284646#eval793563946; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.732284646.793563946; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660.028; https://elifesciences.org/articles/33660#author-response; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.33660
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know