The role of APETALA1 in petal number robustness
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 7
2018
- 23Citations
- 67Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef20
- Captures67
- Readers67
- 67
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Article Description
Invariant floral forms are important for reproductive success and robust to natural perturbations. Petal number, for example, is invariant in Arabidopsis thaliana flowers. However, petal number varies in the closely related species Cardamine hirsuta, and the genetic basis for this difference between species is unknown. Here we show that divergence in the pleiotropic floral regulator APETALA1 (AP1) can account for the species-specific difference in petal number robustness. This large effect of AP1 is explained by epistatic interactions: A. thaliana AP1 confers robustness by masking the phenotypic expression of quantitative trait loci controlling petal number in C. hirsuta. We show that C. hirsuta AP1 fails to complement this function of A. thaliana AP1, conferring variable petal number, and that upstream regulatory regions of AP1 contribute to this divergence. Moreover, variable petal number is maintained in C. hirsuta despite sufficient standing genetic variation in natural accessions to produce plants with four-petalled flowers.
Bibliographic Details
10.7554/elife.39399; 10.7554/elife.39399.006; 10.7554/elife.39399.010; 10.7554/elife.39399.012; 10.7554/elife.39399.001; 10.7554/elife.39399.026; 10.7554/elife.39399.011; 10.7554/elife.39399.020; 10.7554/elife.39399.002; 10.7554/elife.39399.025; 10.7554/elife.39399.023; 10.7554/elife.39399.003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055623274&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30334736; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#fig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.006; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#fig3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.010; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#fig4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.012; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#abstract; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.001; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#respfig2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.026; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#table1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.011; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#fig5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.020; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#digest; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.002; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#respfig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.025; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#fig6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.023; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399#fig1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399.003; https://elifesciences.org/articles/39399; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.39399
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know