PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions

eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 12
2023
  • 7
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 52
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 3
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    7
  • Captures
    52
  • Mentions
    1
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1
  • Social Media
    3
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      3
      • Facebook
        3

Most Recent Blog

Guest Post: Improving Methods Reporting in the Life Sciences

What can we do to encourage and improve methods reporting in scientific articles? A new report summarizes recommendations for editors and publishers alike. The post Guest Post: Improving Methods Reporting in the Life Sciences appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen.

Article Description

Reproducible research and open science practices have the potential to accelerate scientific progress by allowing others to reuse research outputs, and by promoting rigorous research that is more likely to yield trustworthy results. However, these practices are uncommon in many fields, so there is a clear need for training that helps and encourages researchers to integrate reproducible research and open science practices into their daily work. Here, we outline eleven strategies for making training in these practices the norm at research institutions. The strategies, which emerged from a virtual brainstorming event organized in collaboration with the German Reproducibility Network, are concentrated in three areas: (i) adapting research assessment criteria and program requirements; (ii) training; (iii) building communities. We provide a brief overview of each strategy, offer tips for implementation, and provide links to resources. We also highlight the importance of allocating resources and monitoring impact. Our goal is to encourage researchers - in their roles as scientists, supervisors, mentors, instructors, and members of curriculum, hiring or evaluation committees - to think creatively about the many ways they can promote reproducible research and open science practices in their institutions.

Bibliographic Details

Kohrs, Friederike E; Auer, Susann; Bannach-Brown, Alexandra; Fiedler, Susann; Haven, Tamarinde Laura; Heise, Verena; Holman, Constance; Azevedo, Flavio; Bernard, René; Bleier, Arnim; Bössel, Nicole; Cahill, Brian Patrick; Castro, Leyla Jael; Ehrenhofer, Adrian; Eichel, Kristina; Frank, Maximillian; Frick, Claudia; Friese, Malte; Gärtner, Anne; Gierend, Kerstin; Grüning, David Joachim; Hahn, Lena; Hülsemann, Maren; Ihle, Malika; Illius, Sabrina; König, Laura; König, Matthias; Kulke, Louisa; Kutlin, Anton; Lammers, Fritjof; Mehler, David M A; Miehl, Christoph; Müller-Alcazar, Anett; Neuendorf, Claudia; Niemeyer, Helen; Pargent, Florian; Peikert, Aaron; Pfeuffer, Christina U; Reinecke, Robert; Röer, Jan Philipp; Rohmann, Jessica L; Sánchez-Tójar, Alfredo; Scherbaum, Stefan; Sixtus, Elena; Spitzer, Lisa; Straßburger, Vera Maren; Weber, Marcel; Whitmire, Clarissa J; Zerna, Josephine; Zorbek, Dilara; Zumstein, Philipp; Weissgerber, Tracey L

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

Neuroscience; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Immunology and Microbiology

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know