Biobank-wide association scan identifies risk factors for late-onset Alzheimer's disease and endophenotypes
eLife, ISSN: 2050-084X, Vol: 12, Page: 0
2024
- 8Citations
- 9Usage
- 25Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Usage9
- Downloads7
- Abstract Views2
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Reports Summarize Alzheimer Disease Study Results from University of Wisconsin Madison (Biobank-wide association scan identifies risk factors for late-onset Alzheimer's disease and endophenotypes)
2024 JUN 11 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Genomics & Genetics Daily -- New study results on Alzheimer disease have been
Article Description
Rich data from large biobanks, coupled with increasingly accessible association statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), provide great opportunities to dissect the complex relationships among human traits and diseases. We introduce BADGERS, a powerful method to perform polygenic score-based biobank-wide association scans. Compared to traditional approaches, BADGERS uses GWAS summary statistics as input and does not require multiple traits to be measured in the same cohort. We applied BADGERS to two independent datasets for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD; n=61,212). Among 1738 traits in the UK biobank, we identified 48 significant associations for AD. Family history, high cholesterol, and numerous traits related to intelligence and education showed strong and independent associations with AD. Furthermore, we identified 41 significant associations for a variety of AD endophenotypes. While family history and high cholesterol were strongly associated with AD subgroups and pathologies, only intelligence and education-related traits predicted pre-clinical cognitive phenotypes. These results provide novel insights into the distinct biological processes underlying various risk factors for AD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85194128574&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.91360; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38787369; https://elifesciences.org/articles/91360; http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.91360.2; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/oa_4/3854; https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4839&context=oa_4; https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.91360
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know