Optimization of feature extraction for automated identification of heart wall regions in different cross sections
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, ISSN: 1347-4065, Vol: 53, Issue: 7 SPEC. ISSUE
2014
- 9Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In most current methods of evaluating the cardiac function based on echocardiography, the heart wall in an ultrasonic image is currently identified manually by an operator. However, this task is very time-consuming and leads to inter- and intraobserver variability. To facilitate the analysis and eliminate operator dependence, automated identification of heart wall regions is essential. We previously proposed a method of automatic identification of heart wall regions using multiple features based on information of the amplitude and phase of the ultrasonic RF echo signal by pattern recognition. In the present study, we investigate a new method of segmenting an ultrasonic image into the heart wall, lumen, and external tissues (includes pericardium) by two-step pattern recognition. Also, parameters in the proposed classification method were examined for application to different cross sections, i.e., long-axis and short-axis views, by considering differences in the motion and echogenicity of the heart walls. Furthermore, moving target indicator (MTI) filtering to suppress echoes from clutters was improved to enhance the separability in the shortaxis view. © 2014 The Japan Society of Applied Physics.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903731266&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7567/jjap.53.07kf09; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.7567/JJAP.53.07KF09; http://stacks.iop.org/1347-4065/53/i=7S/a=07KF09/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/1347-4065/53/i=7S/a=07KF09?key=crossref.18876ee496bfb1d5a719939e0216d304; https://dx.doi.org/10.7567/jjap.53.07kf09; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=ce79d35b-29c2-4df2-85b5-56f0fc136804&ssb=74385223987&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.7567%2FJJAP.53.07KF09&ssi=b1fe33a7-cnvj-4677-b9a1-19727dd1798f&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=618073302382070622429235401289537964&ssn=d622f52159ecc45d91af855e636efdb459c9fe105911-65fe-48dc-8ae5df&sso=ec0d7150-9319bfde79b5e9a75c8ead1bf1bc85881d01e837dc5c86b0&ssp=34761788991726272660172644363361021&ssq=43802857611595439273363731070610821230448&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMzZjZDcxYjQtYzE1Yy00OTVhLWFjNjEtNTM4YWIxMWM0ZjdhNC0xNzI2MjYzNzMxNDQwMjEyMzgzNzkwLTJjY2IyMDRjODg1ZTgyYjcyNDI4NTQiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBmY2NjNzQxOC1mYzFiLTRjNmEtODMwYS1iMjY5YmYxNWM5NTIxNzI2MjYzNzMxNDQwMjEyMzgzNzkwLTEzZDZiNjJiM2RkYzQyMjEyNDI4NjkifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know