MLitB: Machine learning in the browser
PeerJ Computer Science, ISSN: 2376-5992, Vol: 2015, Issue: 7, Page: e11
2015
- 24Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
With few exceptions, the field ofMachine Learning (ML) research has largely ignored the browser as a computational engine. Beyond an educational resource for ML, the browser has vast potential to not only improve the state-of-the-art in ML research, but also, inexpensively and on a massive scale, to bring sophisticated ML learning and prediction to the public at large. This paper introduces MLitB, a prototype ML framework written entirely in Javascript, capable of performing large-scale distributed computing with heterogeneous classes of devices. The development of MLitB has been driven by several underlying objectives whose aim is to make ML learning and usage ubiquitous (by using ubiquitous compute devices), cheap and effortlessly distributed, and collaborative. This is achieved by allowing every internet capable device to run training algorithms and predictive models with no software installation and by saving models in universally readable formats. Our prototype library is capable of training deep neural networks with synchronized, distributed stochastic gradient descent. MLitB offers several important opportunities for novel ML research, including: development of distributed learning algorithms, advancement of web GPU algorithms, novel field and mobile applications, privacy preserving computing, and green grid-computing. MLitB is available as open source software.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj-cs.11; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-1; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-7; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-8; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-6; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-5; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-4; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-3; 10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-2
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84987659184&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-1; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-7; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-8; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-6; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-5; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-4; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-3; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/fig-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.11/fig-2; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11/; https://peerj.com/articles/cs-11.pdf
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know