Deep reinforcement learning models in auction item price prediction: an optimisation study of a cross-interval quotation strategy
PeerJ Computer Science, ISSN: 2376-5992, Vol: 10, Page: e2159
2024
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the contemporary digitalization landscape and technological advancement, the auction industry undergoes a metamorphosis, assuming a pivotal role as a transactional paradigm. Functioning as a mechanism for pricing commodities or services, the procedural intricacies and efficiency of auctions directly influence market dynamics and participant engagement. Harnessing the advancing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the auction sector proactively integrates AI methodologies to augment efficacy and enrich user interactions. This study delves into the intricacies of the price prediction challenge within the auction domain, introducing a sophisticated RL-GRU framework for price interval analysis. The framework commences by adeptly conducting quantitative feature extraction of commodities through GRU, subsequently orchestrating dynamic interactions within the model’s environment via reinforcement learning techniques. Ultimately, it accomplishes the task of interval division and recognition of auction commodity prices through a discerning classification module. Demonstrating precision exceeding 90% across publicly available and internally curated datasets within five intervals and exhibiting superior performance within eight intervals, this framework contributes valuable technical insights for future endeavours in auction price interval prediction challenges.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know