Non-lethal approach identifies variability of δN values in the fin rays of Atlantic Goliath Grouper, Epinephelus itajara
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2015, Issue: 6, Page: e1010
2015
- 13Citations
- 86Usage
- 58Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef3
- Usage86
- Downloads83
- Abstract Views3
- Captures58
- Readers58
- 58
Article Description
The Atlantic Goliath Grouper, Epinephelus itajara, is critically endangered throughout its range but has begun to show initial signs of recovery in Florida state waters. As the population continues to rebound, researchers face a pressing need to fill the knowledge gaps about this iconic species. Here, we examined the δN isotopic records in fin rays collected from Atlantic Goliath Grouper, and related changes of isotopic ratios over time to life history characteristics. Fin-ray analysis was used as a non-lethal technique to sample individuals from two locations at similar latitudes from the west and east coasts of Florida, USA. δN data were acquired by mechanically separating the annuli of each fin ray and then analyzing the material in an Irradiance Elemental Analyzer Mass Spectrometer. The δN values were consistent among individuals within populations from each coast of Florida, and mirrored the expected changes over the lives of the fish. Overall, differences were found between δN values at juvenile life history phases versus adult phases, but the patterns associated with these differences were unique to each coastal group.We demonstrated, for the first time, that δN values from fin rays can be used to assess the life histories of Atlantic Goliath Grouper. The non-lethal strategies outlined here can be used to acquire information essential to the management of species of concern, such as those that are threatened or endangered.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.1010; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-3; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-8; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-1; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-2; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-5; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-6; 10.7717/peerj.1010/table-1; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-4; 10.7717/peerj.1010/supp-1; 10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-7
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945177179&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082864; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-3; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-8; https://peerj.com/articles/1010; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-2; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-5; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-6; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-4; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/supp-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/supp-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/fig-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1010/fig-7; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/msc_facpub/2284; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3324&context=msc_facpub; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/; https://peerj.com/articles/1010.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/1010/#fig-7
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know