The apparent permeabilities of Caco-2 cells to marketed drugs: Magnitude, and independence fromboth biophysical properties and endogenite similarities
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2015, Issue: 11, Page: e1405
2015
- 40Citations
- 116Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations40
- Citation Indexes39
- 39
- CrossRef33
- Patent Family Citations1
- Patent Families1
- Captures116
- Readers116
- 116
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
PERMEABILITY STUDIES – Onion Epithelial Membrane as a Model for Predicting Intestinal Absorption of Drugs
INTRODUCTION The oral route of drug administration remains the widely preferred administration route for most new chemical entities.1 The oral route is preferred by virtue
Article Description
We bring together fifteen, nonredundant, tabulated collections (amounting to 696 separate measurements) of the apparent permeability (P) of Caco-2 cellsto marketed drugs.While in some cases there are some significant interlaboratory disparities, most are quite minor. Most drugs are not especially permeable through Caco-2 cells, with the median P value being some 16 · 10 cm s. This value is considerably lower than those (1,310 and 230 · 10 cm s) recently used in some simulations that purported to show that P values were too great to be transportermediated only. While these values are outliers, all values, and especially the comparatively low values normally observed, are entirely consistent with transporteronly mediated uptake, with no need to invoke phospholipid bilayer diffusion. The apparent permeability of Caco-2 cells to marketed drugs is poorly correlated with either simple biophysical properties, the extent of molecular similarity to endogenous metabolites (endogenites), or any specific substructural properties. In particular, the octanol:water partition coefficient, logP, shows negligible correlation with Caco-2 permeability. The data are best explained on the basis that most drugs enter (and exit) Caco-2 cells via amultiplicity of transporters of comparatively weak specificity.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.1405; 10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-4; 10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-3; 10.7717/peerj.1405/table-1; 10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-2; 10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-5; 10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-1; 10.7717/peerj.1405/supp-1
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84949636107&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26618081; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/fig-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-4; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/fig-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-3; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1405; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/fig-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-2; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/fig-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-5; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/fig-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405/fig-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/supp-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1405/supp-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1405/; https://peerj.com/articles/1405.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/1405.html
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know