Inside-out flowers of Lacandonia brasiliana (Triuridaceae) provide new insights into fundamental aspects of floral patterning
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2016, Issue: 2, Page: e1653
2016
- 9Citations
- 25Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef2
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
- Mentions4
- References4
- Wikipedia4
Article Description
Background and Aims. A recently described Brazilian species, Lacandonia brasiliana, shares with its longer established putative sister species from Mexico, L. schismatica, inverted floral patterning (carpels surrounding stamens) that is almost unique among angiosperms. We present a detailed ontogenetic study of L. brasiliana for comparison with other members of the tribe Triurideae (Triuridaceae) to explore the possible evolutionary origins of "inside-out" flowers. Methods. Wild-source populations of L. brasiliana were compared morphologically and ontogenetically with related species of Triurideae, using light and scanning electron microscopy. Key Results. Relatively few morphological differences separate flowers of L. brasiliana and L. schismatica. Both species have tepals with late-developing subapical appendages. In both species, the three central (almost sessile) anthers develop precociously with respect to the carpels; the anthers remain closed, and fertilization is achieved via pollentube growth from germinating pollen grains of the same cleistogamous flower. Carpels are initiated on fascicles. Conclusions. The close similarity between the two Lacandonia species makes it unlikely that they arose independently from two separate homeotic transformation events; they could either represent sister species or two populations of a single disjunct species. Our study underlines the problematic generic and species boundaries within Triurideae. We present an evolutionary scenario of character evolution in Triuridaceae. The inside-out Lacandonia flower could have resulted from a stabilized homeotic transformation; this hypothesis is not in conflict with constrasting theories of the origin of the Triuridaceae flower, which coincided with a shift to unisexuality. The unisexual yet highly plastic flowers that are typical of Triuridaceae could have pre-adapted the origin of the extraordinary Lacandonia morphology.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.1653; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-8; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-13; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-2; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-1; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-10; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-6; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-9; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-5; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-12; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-11; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-4; 10.7717/peerj.1653/table-1; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-3; 10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-7
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84957541451&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26870611; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-8; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-13; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-13; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-2; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1653; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-10; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-6; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-9; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-5; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-12; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-12; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-11; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-11; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-4; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-3; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/fig-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1653/fig-7; https://peerj.com/articles/1653/; https://peerj.com/articles/1653.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/1653.html
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know