Development and validation of a 36-gene sequencing assay for hereditary cancer risk assessment
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2017, Issue: 2, Page: 1-23
2017
- 18Citations
- 47Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef3
- Captures47
- Readers47
- 47
Article Description
The past two decades have brought many important advances in our understanding of the hereditary susceptibility to cancer. Numerous studies have provided convincing evidence that identification of germline mutations associated with hereditary cancer syndromes can lead to reductions in morbidity and mortality through targeted risk management options. Additionally, advances in gene sequencing technology now permit the development of multigene hereditary cancer testing panels. Here, we describe the 2016 revision of the Counsyl Inherited Cancer Screen for detecting single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), short insertions and deletions (indels), and copy number variants (CNVs) in 36 genes associated with an elevated risk for breast, ovarian, colorectal, gastric, endometrial, pancreatic, thyroid, prostate, melanoma, and neuroendocrine cancers. To determine test accuracy and reproducibility, we performed a rigorous analytical validation across 341 samples, including 118 cell lines and 223 patient samples. The screen achieved 100% test sensitivity across different mutation types, with high specificity and 100% concordance with conventional Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). We also demonstrated the screen's high intra-run and inter-run reproducibility and robust performance on blood and saliva specimens. Furthermore, we showed that pathogenic Alu element insertions can be accurately detected by our test. Overall, the validation in our clinical laboratory demonstrated the analytical performance required for collecting and reporting genetic information related to risk of developing hereditary cancers.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.3046; 10.7717/peerj.3046/table-2; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-1; 10.7717/peerj.3046/table-3; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-4; 10.7717/peerj.3046/table-4; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-3; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-2; 10.7717/peerj.3046/table-6; 10.7717/peerj.3046/table-5; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-8; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-5; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-6; 10.7717/peerj.3046/table-1; 10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-7
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85013863173&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243543; https://peerj.com/articles/3046; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/table-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/table-2; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-1; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/table-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/table-3; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-4; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/table-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/table-4; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-3; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-2; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/table-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/table-6; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/table-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/table-5; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-8; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-5; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-6; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/supp-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3046/supp-7; https://peerj.com/articles/3046/; https://peerj.com/articles/3046.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/3046.html
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know