The Brazilian version of the 20-item rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine and dentistry
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2017, Issue: 8, Page: e3744
2017
- 21Citations
- 94Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef12
- Captures94
- Readers94
- 94
Article Description
Background. The misunderstanding of specific vocabulary may hamper the patienthealth provider communication. The 20-item Rapid Estimate Adult Literacy in Medicine and Dentistry (REALMD-20) was constructed to screen patients by their ability in reading medical/dental terminologies in a simple and rapid way. This study aimed to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of this instrument for its application in Brazilian dental patients. Methods. The cross-cultural adaptation was performed through conceptual equivalence, verbatim translation, semantic, item and operational equivalence, and backtranslation. After that, 200 participants responded the adapted version of the REALMD- 20, the Brazilian version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (BREALD- 30), ten questions of the Brazilian National Functional Literacy Index (BNFLI), and a questionnaire with socio-demographic and oral health-related questions. Statistical analysis was conducted to assess the reliability and validity of the REALMD-20 (P < 0:05). Results. The sample was composed predominantly by women (55.5%) and white/brown (76%) individuals, with an average age of 39.02 years old (±15:28). The average REALMD-20 score was 17.48 (±2.59, range 8-20). It displayed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha D 0.789) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0:73; 95% CI [0:66-0:79]). In the exploratory factor analysis, six factors were extracted according to Kaiser's criterion. The factor I (eigenvalueD4.53) comprised four terms- "Jaundice", "Amalgam", "Periodontitis" and "Abscess"-accounted for 25.18% of total variance, while the factor II (eigenvalue = 1.88) comprised other four terms- "Gingivitis", "Instruction", "Osteoporosis" and "Constipation"-accounted for 10.46% of total variance. The first four factors accounted for 52.1% of total variance. The REALMD-20 was positively correlated with the BREALD-30 (Rs = 0:73, P < 0:001) and BNFLI (Rs=0:60, P < 0:001). The scores were significantly higher among health professionals, more educated people, and individuals who reported good/excellent oral health conditions, and who sought preventive dental services. Distinctly, REALMD-20 scores were similar between both participants who visited a dentist < 1 year ago and ≥1 year. Also, REALMD-20 was a significant predictor of self-reported oral health status in a multivariate logistic regression model, considering socio-demographic and oral health-related confounding variables. Conclusion. The Brazilian version of the REALMD-20 demonstrated adequate psychometric properties for screening dental patients in relation to their recognition of health specific terms. This instrument can contribute to identify individuals with important dental/medical vocabulary limitations in order to improve the health education and outcomes in a person-centered care model.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.3744; 10.7717/peerj.3744/supp-1; 10.7717/peerj.3744/table-1; 10.7717/peerj.3744/table-4; 10.7717/peerj.3744/table-5; 10.7717/peerj.3744/table-3; 10.7717/peerj.3744/table-2
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028572388&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3744; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875082; https://peerj.com/articles/3744/supp-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3744/supp-1; https://peerj.com/articles/3744/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3744/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/3744; https://peerj.com/articles/3744/table-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3744/table-4; https://peerj.com/articles/3744/table-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3744/table-5; https://peerj.com/articles/3744/table-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3744/table-3; https://peerj.com/articles/3744/table-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3744/table-2; https://peerj.com/articles/3744/; https://peerj.com/articles/3744.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/3744.html
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know