On the exponent in the Von Bertalanffy growth model
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2018, Issue: 1, Page: e4205
2018
- 30Citations
- 65Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- Captures65
- Readers65
- 65
Article Description
Von Bertalanffy proposed the differential equation m'(t)=p×m(t)-q×m(t) for the description of the mass growth of animals as a function m(t) of time t. He suggested that the solution using the metabolic scaling exponent a = 2/3 (Von Bertalanffy growth function VBGF) would be universal for vertebrates. Several authors questioned universality, as for certain species other models would provide a better fit. This paper reconsiders this question. Based on 60 data sets from literature (37 about fish and 23 about non-fish species) it optimizes the model parameters, in particular the exponent 0≤a < 1, so that the model curve achieves the best fit to the data. The main observation of the paper is the large variability in the exponent, which can vary over a very large range without affecting the fit to the data significantly, when the other parameters are also optimized. The paper explains this by differences in the data quality: variability is low for data from highly controlled experiments and high for natural data. Other deficiencies were biologically meaningless optimal parameter values or optimal parameter values attained on the boundary of the parameter region (indicating the possible need for a different model). Only 11 of the 60 data sets were free of such deficiencies and for them no universal exponent could be discerned.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.4205; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-7; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-5; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-8; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-4; 10.7717/peerj.4205/table-1; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-1; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-9; 10.7717/peerj.4205/table-2; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-6; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-3; 10.7717/peerj.4205/supp-2; 10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-2; 10.7717/peerj.4205/supp-1; 10.7717/peerj.4205/table-3
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85039997200&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29312827; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-7; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-5; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-8; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-4; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-1; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-9; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/table-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/table-2; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-6; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-3; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/supp-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/supp-2; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/fig-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/fig-2; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/supp-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/supp-1; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/table-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4205/table-3; https://peerj.com/articles/4205; https://peerj.com/articles/4205/; https://peerj.com/articles/4205.pdf; https://peerj.com/articles/4205.html
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know