Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the "copper moss" Mielichhoferia elongata reveals independent nad7 gene functionality loss
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2018, Issue: 2, Page: e4350
2018
- 12Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef9
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
The mitochondrial genome of moss Mielichhoferia elongata has been sequenced and assembled with Spades genome assembler. It consists of 100,342 base pairs and has practically the same gene set and order as in other known bryophyte chondriomes. The genome contains 66 genes including three rRNAs, 24 tRNAs, and 40 conserved mitochondrial proteins genes. Unlike the majority of previously sequenced bryophyte mitogenomes, it lacks the functional nad7 gene. The phylogenetic reconstruction and scrutiny analysis of the primary structure of nad7 gene carried out in this study suggest its independent pseudogenization in different bryophyte lineages. Evaluation of the microsatellite (simple sequence repeat) content of the M. elongata mitochondrial genome indicates that it could be used as a tool in further studies as a phylogenetic marker. The strongly supported phylogenetic tree presented here, derived from 33 protein coding sequences of 40 bryophyte species, is consistent with other reconstructions based on a number of different data sets.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.4350; 10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-4; 10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-4; 10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-2; 10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-3; 10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-3; 10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-1; 10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-1; 10.7717/peerj.4350/table-2; 10.7717/peerj.4350/table-1; 10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-2
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041298595&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416956; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/supp-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-4; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/fig-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-4; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/supp-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-2; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/supp-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-3; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/fig-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-3; https://peerj.com/articles/4350; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/fig-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-1; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/supp-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/supp-1; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/table-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/table-2; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/fig-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4350/fig-2; https://peerj.com/articles/4350/; https://peerj.com/articles/4350.html; https://peerj.com/articles/4350.pdf
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know