Factors associated with leisure time physical inactivity in black individuals: Hierarchical model
PeerJ, ISSN: 2167-8359, Vol: 2014, Issue: 1, Page: e577
2014
- 6Citations
- 48Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef1
- Captures48
- Readers48
- 48
Article Description
Background: A number of studies have shown that the black population exhibits higher levels of leisure-time physical inactivity (LTPI), but few have investigated the factors associated with this behavior. Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze associated factors and the explanatory model proposed for LTPI in black adults. Methods: The design was cross-sectional with a sample of 2,305 adults from 20-96 years of age, 902 (39.1%) men, living in the city of Salvador, Brazil. LTPI was analyzed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). A hierarchical model was built with the possible factors associated with LTPI, distributed in distal (age and sex), intermediate 1 (socioeconomic status, educational level and marital status), intermediate 2 (perception of safety/violence in the neighborhood, racial discrimination in private settings and physical activity at work) and proximal blocks (smoking and participation in Carnival block rehearsals).We estimated crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) using logistic regression. Results: The variables inversely associated with LTPI were male gender, socioeconomic status and secondary/university education, although the proposed model explains only 4.2% of LTPI. Conclusions: We conclude that male gender, higher education and socioeconomic status can reduce LTPI in black adults.
Bibliographic Details
10.7717/peerj.577; 10.7717/peerj.577/table-3; 10.7717/peerj.577/table-2; 10.7717/peerj.577/fig-1; 10.7717/peerj.577/table-1
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907699723&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.577; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289177; https://peerj.com/articles/577; https://peerj.com/articles/577/table-3; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.577/table-3; https://peerj.com/articles/577/table-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.577/table-2; https://peerj.com/articles/577/fig-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.577/fig-1; https://peerj.com/articles/577/table-1; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.577/table-1; https://peerj.com/articles/577/; https://peerj.com/articles/577.pdf
PeerJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know