Is There a Case for Case-Based Learning in Pharmacology?
Cureus, ISSN: 2168-8184, Vol: 15, Issue: 6, Page: e39835
2023
- 1Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Background In a didactic lecture (DL), students listen, take notes, and passively accept the knowledge. Case-based learning (CBL) uses clinical cases for active learning and productive outcome. Although some studies have shown that DL is less effective than CBL, the results were inconclusive. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CBL in pharmacology. Methodology This study involved 80 second-year medical students divided into two groups. The results of post-test scores and retention test one month later were compared between the groups using multiple-choice questions. Results DL showed statistically significant better outcomes in immediate learning compared to CBL in both groups (p = 0.000 and 0.002). Although there were slightly better retention scores for CBL compared to DL in both groups, it was not statistically significant. Conclusions DL showed significantly better immediate learning outcomes compared to CBL, with no difference in long-term outcomes for both teaching-learning methods. Hence, DL continues to be the gold standard for teaching pharmacology.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know