Craniofacial inclination at 14 to 39 weeks' gestation in normal Korean fetuses
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, ISSN: 1550-9613, Vol: 31, Issue: 4, Page: 569-576
2012
- 8Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef1
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Objectives - The purpose of this study was to evaluate a normal range for prenatal craniofacial inclination using images of fetal profiles at 14 to 39 weeks' gestation in normal Korean fetuses. Methods - We conducted a cross-sectional study of 308 normal fetuses at 14 to 39 weeks' gestation. After the exclusion of images with inadequate quality, the sagittal plane of the sonographic fetal facial profile from 250 normal fetuses was evaluated. The frontomaxillary facial, frontonasal, maxilla-nasion-mandibular, and mandibulomaxillary facial angles were measured and are presented according to gestational age. Results - The overall mean frontomaxillary facial angle ± SD was 86.0° ± 7.6° between 14 weeks 6 days' and 39 weeks 2 days' gestation without a significant association between the frontomaxillary facial angle and gestational week. The overall mean frontonasal, maxilla-nasion-mandibular, and mandibulomaxillary facial angles were 125.8° ± 7.2°, 4.7° ± 3.3°, and 83.2° ± 8.5° between 14 weeks and 39 weeks 6 days. There was a significant linear correlation between gestational age and the frontonasal angle (r = - 0.1534; P = .0187; y = -0.188 × gestational age + 130.7), maxilla-nasion-mandibular angle (r = -0.2773; P < .0001; y = -0.160 × gestational age + 9.0), and mandibulomaxillary facial angle (r = -0.2861; P < .0001; y = -0.432 × gestational age + 94.6). Conclusions - We provide preliminary normative data for fetal facial angles related to craniofacial inclination across gestational ages in normal Korean fetuses. These data may be of help not only for the understanding of normal facial growth in utero but also for diagnosis of abnormal fetal facial dimensions. © 2012 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864220522&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.569; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22441913; http://doi.wiley.com/10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.569; https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.569; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.569
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know