Quantitative elastosonography of the myotendinous junction normal behavior and correlation with a standard measurement system during functional tests
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, ISSN: 1550-9613, Vol: 36, Issue: 1, Page: 141-147
2017
- 6Citations
- 51Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef1
- Captures51
- Readers51
- 51
Article Description
Objectives-In recent years, an increasing need to use imaging to assess normal and adaptive muscle function, in addition to its anatomy and structure, has emerged. We evaluated the myotendinous junction's elastosonographic behavior in light of the most recent literature on its physiologic behavior. The elastosonographic studies were compared with the results obtained from a standard measurement system to ensure a correlation with maximal muscle contraction. Methods-Nineteen male professional soccer players were assessed during functional tests. The participants performed 5 repetitions at 608/s to assess muscle strength and 3 repetitions at 308/s to assess the maximum force peak of thigh muscles. The participants were monitored by a strength-power measurement system and an ultrasound machine equipped with multifrequency (18-6-MHz) linear array transducers. Results-The 19 soccer players were aged between 19 and 34 years (mean age, 28 years). For the right rectus femoris, the results of the elastosonographic studies showed a mean elasticity value 6 SD of 30.75% 6 10.05% with the muscle relaxed and a value of 13.75% 6 8.44% during contraction (mean decrease, 17.00% 6 11.71%). Elasticity values were 36.48% 6 8.39% before contraction and 8.77% 6 6.55% during contraction of the left rectus femoris muscle (mean decrease, 27.71% 6 11.95%). For 308 eccentric contraction of the left leg, correlation with the standard measurement system showed Pearson r values of 20.53 and 20.51 when comparing force peak and mean work, respectively, with elasticity values. Conclusions-Our study shows that strain elastosonographic quantification of muscle elasticity seems to match the expected physiologic and biomechanical behavior of the myotendinous junction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85010604473&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.11023; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27925702; http://doi.wiley.com/10.7863/ultra.15.11023; https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.11023; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.7863/ultra.15.11023
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know