Feasibility of Unbiased RNA Profiling of Colorectal Tumors: A Proof of Principle
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 11, Issue: 7, Page: e0159522
2016
- 3Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Despite recent advances in molecular profiling of colorectal cancer (CRC), as of yet this has not translated into an unbiased molecular liquid biopsy profile which can accurately screen for early CRC. In this study we depict the profile of early stage CRC as well as for advanced adenomas (AA) by combination of current molecular knowledge with microarray technology, using efficient circulating free plasma RNA purification from blood and RNA amplification technologies. We joined literature search with Affymetrix gene chip experimental procedure to draw the circulating free plasma RNA profile of colorectal cancer disease reflected in blood. The RNA panel was tested by two datasets comparing patients with CRC with healthy subjects and patients with AA to healthy subjects. For the CRC patient cohort (28 CRC cases vs. 41 healthy controls), the ROC analysis of the selected biomarker panel generated a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 93% for the detection of CRC using 8-gene classification model. For the AA patient cohort (28 subjects vs. 46 healthy controls), a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 87% were calculated using a 2-gene classification model. We have identified a panel of 8 plasma RNA markers as a preliminary panel for CRC detection and subset markers suitable for AA detection. Subjected to extensive clinical validation we suggest that this panel represents a feasible approach and a potential strategy for noninvasive early diagnosis, as a first-line screening test for asymptomatic, average-risk population before colonoscopy.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979703568&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441409; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0159522; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t003; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t001; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0159522&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159522.t002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know