Bureaucratic ethics, the market, and administration ideology: Contradictions in the conservative response to the state's "crisis of character"
Dados, ISSN: 0011-5258, Vol: 43, Issue: 1, Page: 119-151
2000
- 5Citations
- 13,741Usage
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the 1980s, a conservative movement for public sector reforms attempted to adjust civil servants' (alleged) egotistical, amoral behavior to the efficient achievement of collective goals, in accordance with the principles of Adam Smith's invisible hand. Based on Karl Polanyi's and Max Weber's classic works on the establishment of the market and of modern bureaucracy, respectively, the article endeavors to show how the conservative approach errs by ignoring the specificities of bureaucratic organization as well as the socially constructed character of the market mentality. The conclusion is that public sector reforms based on the assumption of self-interest end up breeding suspicion and fostering precisely the corrupt behavior that they are meant to forestall, thereby reinforcing the State's incapacity to properly manage its actions in the social sphere.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0041118384&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0011-52582000000100004; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582000000100004&lng=pt&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582000000100004&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0011-52582000000100004&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582000000100004; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0011-52582000000100004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0011-52582000000100004; https://www.scielo.br/j/dados/a/QNbMmvCG4FFqZF8XMSLhhqC/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know