Accessibility evaluation of an Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) tool
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 8516 LNCS, Issue: PART 4, Page: 529-540
2014
- 8Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
People with communication needs use Assistive Technology (AT) to participate in society, be at the family, school among others. There is a variety of different Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) devices due to end-users have different communication needs. AraBoard is an AAC tool developed with the aim to facilitate the functional communication to people with complex communication needs. In this paper, AraBoard tool is presented. In order to ensure the quality of the tool, an accessibility evaluation has been carried out. Following a methodical approach, two main steps have been followed in the evaluation process: (1) Two lists of checkpoints have been developed based on the study and analysis of accessibility standards and related work in the domain of AAC; (2) An evaluation using these resources has been conducted by accessibility experts. The results from the study indicate a high level of accessibility in AraBoard tool, besides some suggestions about new requirements to integrate in the tool have been obtained. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903469049&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_50; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_50; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_50; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_50; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_50
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know