Rumen bacterial diversity in relation to nitrogen retention in beef cattle
Anaerobe, ISSN: 1075-9964, Vol: 67, Page: 102316
2021
- 26Citations
- 52Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- Captures52
- Readers52
- 52
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Review Description
This study aimed to characterize the rumen bacterial diversity of beef steers differing in the efficiency of nitrogen retention (ENR). Eight castrated steers and fitted with ruminal silicone - and duodenal T-type cannulas were used in a cross-over design with three consecutive periods and three diets. During each experimental period, nitrogen balance was measured, and based on the efficiency of N utilization data, steers were split into three ENR groups: high (HNR, 56.6% ± 3.3%, n = 10), medium (MNR, 45.8% ± 2.2%, n = 6), and low (LNR, 37.7% ± 1.9%, n = 8) using the NbClust package version 2.0.4 in R. Prevotellaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Leuconostocaceae, Clostridiales_Incertae_Sedis_XIII, Lachnospiraceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae were more abundant in LNR ( P < 0.05) compared to HNR or MNR. Negative correlations were found between N retention and Mogibacterium, Anaerofustis, Butyrivibrio, Coprococcus, Hespellia, Lactonifactor and Lachnospiraceae (r ≤ −0.61; P ≤ 0.05). Prevotella, Hespellia, Lactonifactor, Lachnospiraceae_other, and Anaerobiospirillum were positively correlated between urinary N excretion ( r > 0.55; P < 0.01), and negative correlations were found with Elusimicrobia, Victivallis and Treponema ( r < −0.41; P < 0.05). The adjustment of the rumen bacterial community differed significantly between the N use retention groups. The high N retention in beef cattle was associated with less abundant bacteria in the rumen; however, N fixation capacity and uncharacterized rumen microorganisms need to be elucidated in future studies. In contrast, lower N utilization was associated with high abundance of bacteria that promote greater urinary N excretion through ruminal protein degradation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996420301724; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102316; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100046743&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33383197; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1075996420301724; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102316
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know