Exergy recovery from solar heated particles to supercritical CO 2
Applied Thermal Engineering, ISSN: 1359-4311, Vol: 146, Page: 469-481
2019
- 22Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this work, the technical feasibility of a fluidized and a fixed bed heat exchanger in a concentrating solar power (CSP) tower for heat recovery applications is analysed using Two-Fluid Model simulations. The heat recovery process analysed in this work corresponds to the discharge of sensible heat from solid particles. In the cases studied, the fluidizing agent of the bed is carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in supercritical conditions and the particles, which constitute the bed material, are sensible heat storage material. CO 2 is gaining attention in its application as a working fluid in thermodynamic cycles for power generation, especially in transcritical and supercritical conditions due to its high density and excellent heat transfer characteristics. Currently, research is focused on exploring the CO 2 capabilities when used in combination with CSP technologies, together with systems that allow the storage and recovery of the solar thermal energy. Fixed or fluidized beds work as a direct contact heat exchanger between the particles and the working fluid that percolates through the bed material. Several bed configurations are presented to derive the optimal configuration of the bed that enhances the efficiency from both the energetic and the exergetic points of view. The results indicate that a fixed bed heat exchanger produces a maximum increase of availability in the CO 2 flow during longer times than a fluidized bed heat exchanger. Therefore, to maximise the exergy recovery from solar heated particles to supercritical CO 2 a fixed bed heat exchanger is more suitable than a fluidized bed heat exchanger.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431118331818; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.10.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054434353&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359431118331818; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1359431118331818?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1359431118331818?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.10.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know