The within groups and the between groups Myerson values
European Journal of Operational Research, ISSN: 0377-2217, Vol: 257, Issue: 2, Page: 586-600
2017
- 7Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper we revisit the additive decomposition that Gómez et al. (2003) introduced for the Myerson value of a symmetric game when viewed as a centrality measure. First, we generalize this decomposition, extending it to general games. This approach permits us to look at the Myerson value of a player as a certain modulus of a two component vector. One of them, the within groups Myerson value, determines which part corresponds to the profit from the coalitions that a given player is in, whereas the other, the between groups Myerson value, evaluates the opportunities that player has as intermediary in the communication among others. These two values are then characterized using additivity and other properties related with previous interpretation: (A) The competitive advantages (or disadvantages) of a null player in a game with restrictions given by a graph (measured in terms of his Myerson value) are due to his ability to intermediate among the others. (B) In the same context, those players essential to coalitions that generate worth cannot obtain profit by intermediating. When restricted to certain symmetric games, the corresponding values can be considered as centrality measures, as they satisfy natural properties that reinforce this interpretation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171630618X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84994718475&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S037722171630618X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S037722171630618X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S037722171630618X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know